Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:43

Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
This Week’s Sex Diary: The Lawyer Who Called Off Her Wedding Two Weeks Ago - The Cut
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Do you want to have an XXX chat?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Does the West have a defense against China's PL17 air-air missile?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
007 First Light Trailer Reveals The First-Ever James Bond Origin Story - GameSpot
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Geologists confirm that these rocks are the oldest ones ever found on Earth - Earth.com
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why is there no evidence of a multiverse theory?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Apple WWDC 2025 Live: New Updates for iOS, Apple Intelligence, Mac OS - CNET
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.